To Get More Lean Videos Please Complete the Info Below.

Name:
Email:
Comments? / Questions?

Lean Choices:

When you are ready to make significant business improvement, you’re faced with many options – Focus on Quality; Drive down Cost; Improve Service; etc. Once you’ve decided on a direction, you then need to provide resources to make it happen – Use existing personnel; Hire outside consultants; Bring in someone from the outside; etc.

The Lean Process:

At The Hands-On Group, we understand these issues and have developed our exclusive Rapid Impact ™ Process to put clear focus on the direction your organization should take. Which is to improve the things which matter most to your customers: Cost, Quality, On Time Delivery and short lead Times. Instead of wasting resources on activities your customers could care less about, our approach unifies your entire organization around improving what will gain you significant advantages in the markets in which you compete.

Real World Experience:

Building on over 20 years of experience, consulting in various industries, we have developed the Rapid Impact™ process to help client companies slash time to market and reduce total inventory, while improving cost, quality and delivery performance. This powerful approach is designed to provide clients significant, and tangible, results in the shortest time possible. In addition, our process is flexible enough to adapt to an organization’s needs as well as the industry in which it competes.

For a Risk-Free Consultation Call 407-299-5245 or, For More Information, and to Download Recent Publications Click HERE

We were dealing with a large, integrated, steel mill when we put together the following presentation for their management team.  It discusses, via example, the tremendous cost, quality, and delivery burden caused by complexity, as well as how “Lean Manufacturing” principles and techniques greatly simplify such an environment.

While the illustration below specifically targets the complexities found in the metal producing industries, I believe you’ll find most aspects are applicable in every industry that is not already operating at a World Class level.

First, let’s define what it is that we call “Operating Complexity.”

Operating Complexity: anything that keeps us from making exactly what the customer wants, exactly when he wants it.

So what’s the big deal?  What kinds of issues does this “operating complexity” cause?

Operating Complexity Causes all sorts of inefficiencies

To help demonstrate these issues, we decided to use a simple bicycle manufacturing example.  We will ask you, as we did the steel company’s management team, to put together a production schedule for this simple bicycle operation.  The following slides describe their current situation.

customer wants 20 bicycles.  How many tires needed?  What's our production schedule?

Quoted Lead Time is different from forecast

How often does your forecast disagree with actual demand?  How often does this “disagreement” occur within your quoted lead time?

While it might be helpful to attempt to improve your forecasts, the real gains come from shortening your response times and attaining near perfect delivery performance.

On-Hand finished good inventory example

First, we’ll want to see if the items in finished goods are of the varieties requested by our customer.   These will be netted from gross requirements, at the appropriate levels of the bill of material, via standard MRP logic.

typical WIP status

Note how “held” material, with no disposition, causes uncertainty.   If you assume that it WILL be available, you risk a missed delivery.   If you assume it WILL NOT be available, you risk excess inventory.

One of our standard objectives is to get all “held” material dispositioned within hours of an occurance.   Your scheduling people MUST know whether to count on this product, or plan to start more.

And what about those two past due tires?   Can you count on them?   And if so, when?   Schedules lose their value if you can’t count on their religious execution.

lead times cause problems with complexity

Note that ALL of these lead times appear to be excessive.  A fundamental objective of a Lean Manufacturing transition is to cut all lead times so as to approach the sum of “value adding” activities.

In this example, it would be difficult to justify more than one day per function, and it would seem reasonable to push for a one day TOTAL cumulative lead time!

Each operating department is on different operating hours

Significant complexity, as well as extended lead times, are caused by unmatched operating schedules, i.e. different “available hours.”   Needless to say, such unmatched operating hours cause inventory build-ups throughout the manufacturing process.

Large “planned maintenance” periods further complicate scheduling as well as force a build-up of inventory prior to the planned shut-down.   Modularizing and cascading planned maintenance are techniques we’ve developed to overcome this issue.

lot size rules (example)

Similarly, large, uneven, batch size requirements further complicate scheduling while adding to the inventory burden at all levels.  Aggressive efforts to cut all lot sizes, and their associated set-up / change-over costs are required.

We have found that most lot sizes are currently too large, even with their existing high change-over costs, when one considers the true costs of complexity that they impose on the organization.

dept optimization rules, run by type of product

run by size

run by color

We see this quite often.  Different operating “efficiency” rules for each machine / department (they’re called “campaign rules” in some industries).  It is caused by an objective to “optimize” each operating unit.  But unit optimization does NOT optimize the “whole.”   In fact, attempting to optimize the individual operations almost always SUB-OPTIMIZES the “whole” total process.

So, how did you do?   Do you have an operating schedule?

Does it REALLY need to be this complex?

The real cost of complexity is huge!

Operating complexity adversely effects production and overhead costs.   And it dramatically effects customer service by extending lead times and degrading on-time delivery performance.

The philosophy and techniques of lean attack the causes of complexity

No one will disagree that complexity costs us money.  Yet most companies treat complexity like it is a non-issue.  This is particularly true when evaluating alternatives.

Even though it is difficult to quantify, the cost of complexity is extremely high.

Lean Manufacturing FORCES simplicity.

Lean Manufacturing philosophy and techniques challenge all lot sizes, and seeks to minimize lead times, allowing for more accurate requirements from your customer.

But what is the fundamental driver of complexity?

In the vast majority of cases, excess complexity is driven by management’s use of incorrect measurements and reward systems.   Remember, “What gets rewarded, gets done.”

Most companies continue to reward “Unit Optimization.”

But, does “unit optimization” optimize the whole manufacturing process?

The answer is an almost universal “NO”.   Unit optimization quite often dramatically sub-optimizes the total process.

Challenge every unit optimization rule

To truly achieve World Class operating performance, the company’s incentive systems must be re-evaluated.   Too many Lean initiatives have come to a screeching halt due to conflicting reward systems.

It is critical to the transition to Lean Manufacturing that Measurements and Rewards be aligned.

In addition to aligned measurement and reward systems, people must be held accountable.

We often utilize the following simple format to keep track of the “rocks” and the commitments that have been made to resolve such problems.   On the shop floor, this type chart is simply drawn on a flip chart page for all to see (e.g. Management by Walking Around).

Accountability, Problem - Idea chart, responsibility, action items, due dates, who by when

As my teenage daughter said, years ago:   “It’s all common sense.”

Reward the behavior that you desire.   And hold people accountable for their commitments.   It’s management 101.   How tough can this be?

In the real world, however, getting top management to revise their long held beliefs in regard to measurements and reward systems can be extremely difficult.

This is truly where a good consultant can earn his or her fee.

We’ve been helping companies make this lean transition since 1988.   And we have the grey hair to prove it!

If and when you should hit this “wall”, give us a call.   There is no charge for a phone conversation, and we’ll do what ever we can to be helpful.

Good luck on your lean manufacturing journey.

PS: For additional explanation and illustration on these topics, we would suggest that you peruse our articles “How to Optimize Your Entire Plant”, and “How to Attain Near-Perfect On-Time Delivery Performance”.
I think you’ll find them helpful.

{ 0 comments }

Utilizing More of the Available Hours

OK, so we’re a one-shift, five days / week, operation.  What’s wrong with that?

Well, nothing is WRONG with that shift pattern.  But, changing to a multi-shift crewing pattern might offer some significant operating and competitive advantages.  Let’s look a bit deeper.

Here’s an illustration of the plant and equipment utilization of an 8 x 5 operation:

baseline

There are 168 hours in a week (24 hrs/day * 7 days/week = 168 hrs/week).

On an 8 x 5 schedule, we are utilizing 40 of the 168 available.  Plant and equipment are unavailable for work 128 hours, or 76% of the time!

But what happens if we were to move half of our workforce to a second shift?

standard 2 shift operation

As shown above, by simply moving half of our workforce to the off-shift, we have doubled the availability of the plant and equipment.

So what’s the advantage of that, you ask?

Actually, there are several very significant advantages to doing so:

    1) We can typically cut our manufacturing lead times in half

    2) We will free up cash and space via inventory reductions, and

    3) We have effectively doubled our tooling and equipment!

Let’s use a simple example to illustrate the lead time impact:

lead time impact of one shift

In the above example, we have four sequential operations.  Each operation requires eight hours of process time.

And, as the illustration shows, our minimum manufacturing lead time is four days.

Now, suppose we transition to a two shift operation, with 50% of our workforce now on the 2nd shift.

moving people to the 2nd shift cuts lead times

Now, operation 1 occurs on the first shift of the first day, and operation 2 happens on the 2nd shift of day one, etc.  What happens to our average lead time?

Correct:   By doubling the available hours, we can half our manufacturing lead times!

It is important to note that we DID NOT INCREASE OUR TOTAL HEADCOUNT.

We still have the same number of people, and essentially the same amount of capacity.  By moving half of our workforce to the 2nd shift, all we have done is make more of the 168 hours available for production.

Now, instead of our product sitting idle 16 hours per day, it is only sitting idle 8 hours per day.

What is the impact on the amount of Work In Process (WIP) inventory?

Correct again.  By utilizing more of the available hours, we can cut our manufacturing lead times in half, which also cuts our WIP inventory in half.   This frees up cash and space.

Note:  If you are a “make to stock” operation, one of the factors used in calculating the appropriate level of Finished Goods inventory is the replenishment time.  Cutting your manufacturing lead time, i.e. the “replenishment time,” should also allow you to reduce the amount of high dollar finished goods inventory needed to achieve the same fill rate.

But how does moving half my workforce to the 2nd shift, add to the amount of equipment and tooling available?

Let’s look at our 8 x 5 situation:

There is no spare equipment or tooling on a one shift operation
On a one shift, five day week, most of our equipment and tooling is manned.

What happens if a machine breaks down?  What if you’d like to double the output on a product, i.e. use two pieces of equipment to make the same part number, but you only have one set of tooling?  Fully manning all operations severely limits your operational flexibility.

But what happens if we move half our workforce to the off shift?

two shift operation makes available equipment and tooling
With only half as many people working on each shift, half of the equipment is un-manned.

Now, if a machine breaks down there’s a possibility that the operator can still be productive on another machine.  This availability of equipment and tooling also allows for the possibility of one operator running two machines.

Maintenance and change-overs can be done without taking a machine off-line.  In fact, many of our clients were able to dedicate a machine to a high running product and completely ELIMINATE the change over for that product!

As you can see, utilizing more of the available hours has a major impact on company well-being.  But why stop there?

With our two eight hour shift operation, we are still utilizing less than 50% of the available hours.  How do we improve on these gains?

Well, you could go to a three shift five day week.  However, another alternative has some significant advantages.

A client of ours had been attempting to add capacity by creating a second shift.  They ran ads for over six months, with no success.  People just didn’t want to work that shift.

We proposed to our client that they offer a four day, ten hours/day, shift.  The catch was that the four work days might not be Monday through Thursday, and might include a Saturday (this is known as a staggered crewing schedule).  Examples of this shift pattern, and many others, are illustrated in our article “Alternate Crewing Schedules.”

We also proposed that the start times for the second shift be adjusted to allow parents to be at home for dinner with the family before coming to work.  They ran an ad for a four day work week, with starting time, 8:00 PM.

The results were amazing!  People were standing in line to get on that shift.

A full second shift was in place and operational within a few months.  Then the first shift’s hours were also adjusted to ten hours / day, four days / week, with staggered crewing.

utilize 120 of the 168 hours available

Tooling, equipment, and crewing are now available 120 hours of the total 168.

Lead times and WIP inventory can be cut by two thirds.

Let me emphasize; none of the alternate schedules shown above increase your total capacity.  In each example, we have the same number of people, working the same number of hours / week.  However, if you should need to add capacity, the infrastructure is now completely in place.  Just add people.  The equipment and a trained workforce “core” are already on hand.

Note that your improved responsiveness can, and should, be leveraged to gain both market share and price.

Needless to say, there is a considerable amount of additional information that goes beyond the introductory scope of this discussion.

There are ways to gradually transition to any of the illustrated crewing structures that do not disrupt people’s life’s.  There are also ways to incorporate similar options for your non-production processes, and ways to cover all shifts without adding supervisory or manufacturing support personnel.
Going to the ten hour, four day shift pattern will impact your holiday and vacation pay schedules as well.
We can help you with these and other related issues.

If you would like to address how multi-shifting might apply in your specific situation, drop us an e-mail or give us a call.  There’s no charge, and we’ll do our best to be helpful.

All the best on your lean journey toward World Class operating performance.

PS: You might also find our article “How to Optimize Your Entire Plant” applicable.

{ 0 comments }

Lean Manufacturing Topic of the Day: Lean Manufacturing and Government Contracts

December 6, 2011

Unique Lean Challenges and Opportunities for Government Contractors Being a supplier to the government and/or aerospace industries is not without its challenges, most of which involve extensive administrative, accounting, and tracking requirements.  Dealing with “difficult” bureaucracies, multiple regulations and agencies, and occasionally contradictory requirements offers its own set of trials.  Luckily, there is another side [...]

Read the full article →

Lean Manufacturing Topic of the Day:  Facility Considerations for Lean Manufacturing

May 10, 2011

How to Build New, or Modify Your Old Plant to Optimize Lean Manufacturing The obvious first question is “Do we really need a new facility” i.e. have we fully utilized the current space? Are we using all available hours (24×7)?  Are we utilizing the full cube (all three dimensions)?  Have we reduced our inventory and [...]

Read the full article →

Lean Manufacturing Topic of the Day:  The Hidden Costs of Procurement

April 17, 2011

Another look at the Make / Buy decision process? Lean Manufacturing defines “Value Adding” activities as those that do, in fact, add value to the final product.  They typically change the form, fit, or function of the product.  They are the activities that the customer must have, and is willing to pay for. While there [...]

Read the full article →

Lean Manufacturing Topic of the Day:  How to Optimize Your Entire Plant

April 8, 2011

Optimize Your Entire Plant Attempting to optimize each operation actually sub-optimizes the whole In the early 1900’s Henry Ford perfected the assembly line.  Since that time, Toyota has further enhanced the concept through the use of a “pull” philosophy, essentially providing assembly line benefits to the subassembly and procurement processes. There is general agreement that [...]

Read the full article →

Lean Manufacturing Topic of the Day:  How to Attain Near-Perfect On-Time Delivery Performance?

March 30, 2011

On-Time, All the Time! Near-Perfect On-Time Delivery is a fundamental requirement for World Class performance. It, along with inventory reduction, is a key driver for a successful lean transition. So how do we get and sustain near perfect delivery performance? As trite as this may sound, it begins with something as simple as DECIDING to [...]

Read the full article →

Lean Manufacturing Topic of the Day:  It’s All About Cash Flow!

March 30, 2011

It’s All About Cash Flow! Cash is King! It’s a common expression, but it also extremely pertinent. While profitability is a good long-term measure of success, many companies have shown a profit right up until the day they went belly-up!  Cash pays the bills. What Ever Your Total Cycle Time Is, It’s Too Long! Time [...]

Read the full article →

Lean Manufacturing Topic of the Day:  Does the concept of Takt Time Apply in Your Business?

March 13, 2011

Takt Time:  Where and When is it Applicable? Takt time is a common lean concept, applicable and beneficial in a number of situations. The idea, in a nutshell, is to produce product at the rate at which the customer requires it.  If the customer demand averages one unit per production minute, produce the product at [...]

Read the full article →

Lean Manufacturing Topic of the Day:  What Does Lean Mean to Top Management?

February 25, 2011

A Lean Synopsis for the CEO Top managers are always stressed for time.  So here is a capsulized summary of how a “Lean Manufacturing” philosophy can provide a critical positive transformation for your company. 1) If you are not, currently, a “lean” enterprise, the transition can provide a Cash Windfall. A fundamental requirement of the [...]

Read the full article →